Bail order of Rhea Chakraborty violates Constitution.

Bombay High Court has granted bail to Rhea Chakraborty. The arguments in the matter were heard over seven days ago and now judgement is pronounced granting bail to her. There is a problem in the order.

Right to liberty is absolute:

As per the constitution, the right to liberty is absolute subject only to restrictions by a valid law. In this case the court took over seven days to decide, if Rhea Chakraborty was entitled to be free. Is that reasonable?

Justice delayed is justice denied:

I had pointed out that the requirement for bail under NDPS Act is very strict and it is almost a mini verdict on innocence. Section 37 of NDPS Act requires that the court must be satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for believing that s/he is not guilty of such offence.  Now the judge has granted bail we have to assume that there was nothing on record to link her with the offence. We can not go into merits of the judgement. The reasons why Rhea should not be granted bail are already discussed here and I am surprised by the order which I have not read as yet.

Justice Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal of Bombay High Court has delivered the verdict after deliberating for seven days. Here is the problem.

Continue reading

Kerala Government’s decision to Challenge CAA under article 131 before Supreme Court.

Politics in India is never a low key affair.

Citizenship Amendment Act has become a law by which persecuted minorities from three neighbouring countries shall get citizenship after in naturalization period of 6 years instead of normal 12 years.

The Kerala government which is a communist and islamist combine had passed a resolution in the state assembly calling upon the union government to withdraw the aforesaid law. It was a vane act targeted at vote banks. If the resolution had to be no legal effect, why was it passed after so much fan fair?

Now the same Kerala government has approached the Supreme Court under article 131 challenging the citizenship Amendment Act. But it’s roadblocks are hard to surmount. Article 131 of the Constitution is as under:

Continue reading

India is not Jamia, JNU and Shaheen Bagh of Delhi.

The Engineered Riots:

The protests happening at Jamia JNU and Shaheen Bagh Delhi aur like three pedal boats set fire in ocean and we start calling that ocean is on fire. Zee TV shows, National and international are treating these incidents the whole India is on fire. Why the media is creating this impression? Is there some vested interest?

BTW 2 of those arrested from Seemapuri, Delhi turned out to be illegal migrants from Bangladesh.

As I had pointed out the other day the violent riots are engineered by Marxist as they always do. 30 years back they did it in Uttar Pradesh, and most of the industries ran away to Rajasthan. The town of Kota which has 1 million population today had one tenth of the population at that time.

Continue reading

Dismantling Islamic Republic of Kashmir

Jammu, Kashmir and Ladakh is Northern most State of India. It was a Kingdom under Hari Singh who acceded with India on 27 October 1947. The Constitution of India came into force on 26 January 1950 but was not made instantly applicable of J&K. Rather a temporary article 372 provided that it could be applied in pieces by Presidential Orders. On 7th August 2019 the entire Constitution of India has been made applicable on J&K without any reservations.

Prior to this the Kashmir in India was nothing short of an Islamic Republic with the only thing missing, was Zazzia for local non-Muslims. However rest of the country pays Zazzia to it. The contribution of Kashmir to the GDP of the country could be around 1% but it gets 10% of the total aid granted to the states by New Delhi.

Elections and corruption:

The Election Commission of India had no jurisdiction and elections were rigged. Three sets of politicians were free to mint money at taxpayers’ cost. Anti Corruption laws were not permitted to be applied on the State.

Continue reading

Freedom of expression or freedom to bleed through thousand cuts.

Making India bleed through thousand cuts:

Zia-ul Haq, the then dictator of Pakistan had formulated the above policy to make India bleed through a thousand cuts after he realised that Pakistan can not win any conventional war with it’s mighty neighbour. Search the above phrase and there will be hundreds of articles highlighting above policy and concluding that the terrorism unleashed through borders is the result of that policy. They are only half correct. Terrorism is official policy of Pakistan to deal with all neighbours.

The creation of ‘Pakistan’ which literally mean “Pure Land” is itself is a hate speech to the rest of world which is automatically termed impure. But the task of Islam/Pakistan is not complete.The Pakistan looks for “Takmeel-e-Pakistan” which means perfection. It will happen when all the Muslim in the world comes together. Can you guess what this “togetherness” will do? No marks for guessing. It is a hush talk of what ISIS dare to speak without mincing words.

The creation of Pakistan saw murder of million and exodus of Millions of Hindu/Sikh/minorities other than Muslims from West Punjab (and East Bengal) which was declared Pakistan. A state born with violence and whose first policy decision was to attack its minorities and second was to attack Kashmir, can not be expected shun violence. Therefore the crucial question is: “What are the above said thousand cuts?

Continue reading